data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0090/f0090bacb0b511ea9bdd321bf663d11b3c13d0f4" alt=""
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0090/f0090bacb0b511ea9bdd321bf663d11b3c13d0f4" alt=""
Characteristics/Advantages
RAID 53 should really be called "RAID 03" because it is implemented as
a striped (RAID level 0) array whose segments are RAID 3 arrays
RAID 53 has the same fault tolerance as RAID 3 as well as the same fault tolerance overhead
High data transfer rates are achieved thanks to its RAID 3 array segments
High I/O rates for small requests are achieved thanks to its RAID 0 striping
Maybe a good solution for sites who would have otherwise gone with RAID 3 but need some additional performance boost
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0090/f0090bacb0b511ea9bdd321bf663d11b3c13d0f4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ccc6/4ccc6ba9e00823cd185735def948625505d3eee3" alt="Back To Top"
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0090/f0090bacb0b511ea9bdd321bf663d11b3c13d0f4" alt=""
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0090/f0090bacb0b511ea9bdd321bf663d11b3c13d0f4" alt=""
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0090/f0090bacb0b511ea9bdd321bf663d11b3c13d0f4" alt=""
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0090/f0090bacb0b511ea9bdd321bf663d11b3c13d0f4" alt=""
Disadvantages
Very expensive to implement
All disk spindles must be synchronized, which limits the choice of drives
Byte striping results in poor utilization of formatted capacity
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0090/f0090bacb0b511ea9bdd321bf663d11b3c13d0f4" alt=""
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0090/f0090bacb0b511ea9bdd321bf663d11b3c13d0f4" alt=""
|